
The New York Observer - July 29, 1996
Change at School Board Means End to Reform
I'LL BET YOU DIDN'T REALIZE IT, BUT...the election of William Thompson
as president of the Board of Education means that We can forget about
school reform in this century. Mr. Thompson is now the only African-American
in a citywide position of real public author-ity: Efforts to weaken
the school board are doomed, since nobody is going to weaken a black
Board of Education president, especially when more than 75 percent
of the kids in the public schools are black or Latino.
The pleas for school board reform have had an unintended consequence:
They've seriously damaged the public schools by diverting attention
from more pressing problems. Such as? How about the excessively low
expectations most teachers have for the kids in their classrooms.
What about the obstacles that Czarina Sandra Feldman, president of
the United Federation of Teachers, throws up whenever a superintendent
tries to improve teacher incompetence?
Most commentators believe that Mayor Giuliani was the hidden force
behind Mr. Thompson's ascension to power, and the consequent ousting
of Carol Gresser, the fomer board president. The truth is much worse.
At a time when math scores have been rising in the city's public schools,
Ms. Gresser forgot how to count to four.
If she wanted to continue as board president, Ms. Gresser needed
four votes on the seven-member board. Assuming she was planning to
vote for herself, she had to have three other members, a relatively
simple bit of nose counting. She seemed suiprised when the vote went
against her. Somebody should buy her a pocket calculator.
DOES GEORGE PATAKI KNOW WHAT HAPPENED IN ALBANY this year? That's
the question Republican heavy hitters are asking themselves as they
prepare for their national convention in San Diego in August Mr. Pataki,
educated at Yale and Columbia law school, is surrounded by fiscal
amateurs and was totally outmaneuvered by the skilled corner men working
for the party spending champs, Joseph Bruno. the Republican Majority
Leader of the State Senate, and Sheldon Silver, Speaker of the Democratic-controlled
Assembly.
Mr. Pataki along with his top aides and his allies in the business
community, believed that the income-tax cuts passed by the State Legislature
in 1995 would lead to spending cuts this year and in future years.
Just the opposite happened. Rather than cut spending, the Legislature
used fiscal gimmicks known as "one-shots" because they don't
provide a continuous revenue stream to save popular programs that
serve the middle class. How can the state afford to cut taxes and
yet not slash popular programs?
That's easy. Wall Street essentially has allowed the state to postpone
the very decisions the financial community sent Mr. Pataki to Albany
to make. Taxes on those record earnings of the past two years have
helped fatten the state's treasury, and have undermined the Govemor's
efforts to cut spending.
Perhaps the Governor will have to sit back and root for a recession.
WHO WOULD HAVE GUESSED that Mayor Giuliani would rescue the child
welfare system? That's exactly what's happening now that Nicholas
Scopetta, Mr. Giulian's handpicked problem-solver, is revamping a
system that often wound up victimizing already traumatized children.
Mr. Scopetta has appointed four of the city's most talented administrators,
Aubrey Featherstone, Eric Brettschneider, Linda Gibbs and BrookeTrent,
to take on the task of improving one of the city's most poorly run
agencies, the Administration for Children's Services. As a result,
the Giuliani administration may actually improve the lives of abused
and neglected kids.
Ms. Trent, a Koch administration veteren, has the difficult task
of geting rid of the precomputerized maze of paperwork that now impedes
intelligent management. Mr. Scopetta shrewdly managed to lure Mr.
Brettschneider, who'd been running a network of community services
for kids. Mr. Featherstone is returning to city employment after taking
a job with one of the city's leading foster-care agencies. Ms. Gibbs,a
lawyer, mother of two young kids and a former deputy budget director
with the city, has the difficult task of turning around an agency
with a 50 percent attrition rate among its caseworkers every year.
But she is well suited to the task.
THE 1996 OLYMPICS SHOW that the Games are strictly for cities with
an inferiority complex. Who needs to be validated by the likes of
Coca-Cola, Delta and
McDonald's? New York's transportation system moves the equivalent
of several cities every day.
Yet for unknown reasons, Olympic fever has infected some New Yorkers,
the Mayor inclued. They've launched a campaign to lure the Games here
in 2008. Why in the world would we want to do such a thing to ourselves?
Does anyone think the Olympics are more essential to New York than,
say, building high-speed rail connections to the airports, or rebuilding
the city's summer recreation programs for kids who can't afford summer
camp in Maine?
But if common sense winds up getting buried in the Fresh Kills landfill
and the Games do come here, lots of luck getting any facilities built
If we can't overcome the environmental wackos who resist any and every
intelligent plan to develop the Hudson River waterfront, how could
we possibly plan and build an Olympic Village?
As for those who get sentimental about the Olympic spirit and all
that it means to host cities, let's bear one thing in mind: The 1984
opening ceremony in Los Angeles featured an athlete named O.J. Simpson.